Sexy, Innocent Child-Woman

Tsk, tsk

When you're up to something, you end up incriminating yourself sooner or later. Your defensive responses, self-absorbed assumptions, and baseless accusations and insinuations--all these are bound to give you away.

Besides, whatever you do in the dark will come to the light. Nasa Bibliya 'yon, diba?


***

You ask: "Why bother to search for my name when I know I am not that famous or important?"

My answer to your question is simple: I didn't do that. Ain't that ridiculous?!

By the way, if you must know, I looked up my own blog and username on the Technorati website out of curiosity, and guess what I found... How could I not find your "private" domain? You once posted the e-mail of a friend--which is so UNETHICAL, by the way--and my name was mentioned in that piece of correspondence. Nananahimik na ako noon, kung tutuusin. I was minding my own business the day my random online search led me to your "private" site (or is that an oxymoron?). I found your "Rush" blog by accident. So sue me.

You have the nerve to say: "My sincere apologies to have put your names in 'private.'" First off, do you even know what you're talking about? If I may ask, kailan pa naging "private" ang isang blog? Wikepedia (2005) defines a blog as a "website that contains written material, links, or photos being posted all the time, usually by one individual, on a personal basis." Granting that a blog is an informal journal intended to reflect the thoughts and views of its owner/s, it still constitutes public domain on account of its location in cyberspace. The same definition would hold true for your "hidden" blog, even if you disclosed its URL to a select group of people.

Secondly, your so-called apology is the most contrived apology I have ever read in this lifetime. You never even identified the person/s you offended by your actions (read: posting someone's e-mail without their consent). Just so you know, I have grounds for complaining about what you did because: 1) you wrongly implicated and maligned my friend by posting her e-mail, on the pretext of venting your frustrations (kahit magpalusot ka nang magpalusot, halatang mali ka pa rin); and 2) my name, which appeared in that e-mail, got dragged into the mess. I dare you to justify your actions. Sincere ka nga ba talaga sa apology mong bulok? Do you know what you're supposed to be sorry for? Perhaps you're only sorry that you were found out.

You claim: "You have taken from me the one, last, little thing that was left of me." I read the post in your "Delusional" blog that you have since removed. Come to think of it, regardless of the circumstances that prompted you to write that entry, you deserved what you went through. If there's anyone to blame for the discovery of your "Rush" blog, which you had intended to conceal, it's you. You got yourself into your own mess.

***

Dops, you can bad-mouth and slander me all you want. You can resort to rude, below-the-belt comments in the absence of substantial assertions. You can deny that you ever accused me falsely and distort the issue so as to insist that I was the one who was "assuming" and "barking at the wrong tree." I have your "rude" e-mails to prove otherwise, but I won't post them because I'm not as vindictive as you are. You can appropriate my arguments and use them for your self-interests, at my expense. Diyan ka naman magaling, diba? Pinahanga mo ako sa ka-drama-han mo. Magaling kang magpaikot ng tao. But it doesn't even matter to me. I won't stoop to your level and dignify all your snide remarks and baseless accusations. The truth will prevail and in the end, I'm sure kakainin mo rin ang lahat ng tsismis at kasinungalingan na pinagkakalat mo.

I'm walking away from all this with a clear conscience, while you're wallowing in your bitterness.

TAPOS!

found herself @ 12:53 AM